51��Ƶ����

❓ Limited AI capabilities compared to AI-native platforms; focuses more on process standardization and human expertise

Advanced algorithms that learn from legal documents to automate and enhance contract analysis, drafting, and review processes.

❓ Relies on member firms' capabilities rather than providing native drafting tools

Does the platform offer a streamlined system for creating full-length legal documents from scratch using AI-powered suggestions, templates, and clause libraries?

❓ Review conducted by member firms rather than through platform-native AI tools

Can the platform run a systematic analysis of legal documents to identify risks, obligations, and key terms while suggesting necessary changes and improvements?

❓ Limited native document assembly features; relies on member firms' capabilities

Can the platform be used to combine pre-approved legal content and templates to quickly create new contracts and legal documents?

❓ Does not offer AI-powered document editing as a core platform feature

Does the platform enhance document editing by suggesting improvements, corrections, and alternative language in the document, in real-time?

❓ Research capabilities provided through member firms rather than platform-native tools

Does the platform directly connect to legal databases and precedents that enable research and citation while drafting documents?

❓ Negotiation support comes from human expertise of member firms rather than technology-enabled tools

Can the platform help track, manage and respond to contract changes and counterparty requests during negotiations?

❓ Limited native data extraction capabilities

Can the platform automatically convert scanned documents and images into searchable, editable text while pulling out key information and data points?

✅ Project management and collaboration tools for multi-jurisdictional matters

Does the platform enable multiple team members to work together on contracts in real-time, with comments, tracked changes, and version control?

✅ Standardized workflows for managing complex cross-border legal projects

Does the platform automate routine legal tasks and document processes through customizable rules and triggers, reducing manual work and streamlining operations?

✅ Basic contract repository and management functions for tracking multi-jurisdictional matters

Does the platform house a centralized system to store, track, and monitor contracts throughout their lifecycle, from creation to expiry?

✅ Detailed reporting on matter progress, timelines, and budgets across jurisdictions

Can the platform track, measure, and visualize contract data, or team usage data to provide real-time ROI figures, actionable business and individual performance insights?

❓ No native private clause library capabilities

A secure repository where organizations store and manage their own frequently-used contract clauses and legal language.

❌ No community template library

A shared collection of pre-built legal document templates, contributed to and accessible by all users of the platform.

❓ Templates managed by individual member firms rather than through a centralized platform library

A secure collection of your organization's customized document templates, accessible only to authorized team members within your company.

Is the platform accessible on the cloud and/or can it be installed directly on-premises, or using company servers?

❓ Limited native Word integration; document handling typically done outside the platform

A seamless integration with Microsoft Word that allows users to draft and edit documents directly within the familiar Word interface.

❓ Limited cloud storage integrations

Does the platform connect with popular cloud storage platforms to access and manage documents directly within the system?

❓ Limited third-party integrations

Can you connect with your existing software via standardized APIs and/or custom integrations?

❓ Not a primary focus of the platform

Can you automatically apply and maintain professional legal document formatting, including numbering, cross-references, and hierarchical styles when editing, and when importing/exporting to MS Word?

✅ Enterprise-grade security for sensitive legal documents and communications

Does data remain encrypted during transmission and storage, protecting sensitive information at every stage of handling?

✅ Meets industry standard security certifications

Which recognized security certifications and regulatory standards can verify the robustness of the platform's data protection measures?

✅ Strong data sovereignty controls for cross-border legal matters

Can the customer own their own data, or can the platform use it and process it, to train their Legal AI models for example?

✅ Multiple authentication options including SSO

Does the platform offer secure login options including API keys, 2FA, tokens, and/or single sign-on to manage system access?

✅ Granular access controls for multi-party projects

Can you manage who can view, edit, and share documents through customizable user roles and restrictions?

✅ Compliant with major privacy regulations globally

Does the platform comply with international data protection requirements including GDPR, CCPA, and other regional privacy laws?

✅ Support available via email, phone, and dedicated account managers

Is there a dedicated support team providing assistance through multiple channels including live chat, email, and phone, with defined response time commitments?

❓ Thorough but lengthy onboarding process for new corporate clients

Is there a structured process to get teams up and running with personalized training, data migration, and system configuration support?

Pilot: ❓ Typically begins with a single multi-jurisdictional matter before expanding usageImplementation Timeline: ❓ 4-6 weeks from agreement to full implementation

If you do go down the sales process (not self-serve) then most want a quick and tailored pilot, followed by rapid implementation.

❓ Subscription-based for platform access plus transparent project-based billing from member firms

Subscription fees, usage limits, and additional costs for accessing and using the platform's features.

Self-serve: ❌ No immediate self-serve option; requires formal onboardingSales: ❓ Typically 4-6 weeks from initial contact to implementation

Self-serve caters to those who want to 'try before they buy' and don't enjoy the sales process.

❓ Some users note learning curve and initial setup complexity

A collection of verified 3rd-party customer reviews documenting any known technical issues.

✅ Case studies show average 25-30% cost savings on multi-jurisdictional projects compared to traditional approaches

Look for firm metrics, tied to the specific tasks you're looking to drive efficiencies within.