51��Ƶ����

A Management Review Process helps company leaders evaluate how well their organization meets its goals and regulatory requirements in Hong Kong. Senior management regularly examines key performance data, audit findings, customer feedback, and compliance records to spot trends and make informed decisions.

In line with Hong Kong's corporate governance expectations, this systematic review ensures businesses stay on track with their objectives while following local regulations and international standards like ISO. The process typically results in documented decisions about resource allocation, process improvements, and strategic changes needed to maintain organizational effectiveness.

Implement a Management Review Process when your Hong Kong organization needs a structured way to evaluate and improve its performance. This becomes essential during major organizational changes, after significant incidents or compliance issues, or when preparing for regulatory audits and certifications.

The process proves particularly valuable for listed companies meeting HKEX governance requirements, regulated entities maintaining SFC compliance, and organizations seeking ISO certification. Regular reviews help catch emerging risks, track improvement initiatives, and demonstrate to stakeholders that leadership actively oversees key business functions and compliance obligations.

• 360 Performance Evaluation System: Company-wide approach focusing on comprehensive feedback from all organizational levels
• 360 Review For Manager: Leadership-specific review process incorporating input from subordinates, peers, and superiors
• Year End Performance Review: Annual assessment model emphasizing achievement of strategic goals and compliance with Hong Kong regulatory requirements

• Senior Management Team: Leads the Management Review Process, sets objectives, and makes final decisions on resource allocation and strategic changes
• Department Heads: Collect and present performance data, implement action items, and track progress in their respective areas
• Quality/Compliance Officers: Ensure the review process meets Hong Kong regulatory requirements and maintain documentation for audit purposes
• External Auditors: Verify the effectiveness of the review process during compliance audits and certification assessments
• Board of Directors: Oversee the overall process and ensure it aligns with corporate governance standards

• Performance Data: Collect key metrics, audit results, and customer feedback from the past review period
• Compliance Records: Gather documentation of regulatory compliance, incident reports, and any correspondence with Hong Kong authorities
• Resource Status: Compile current information about staffing, budget allocation, and equipment utilization
• Stakeholder Input: Document feedback from employees, customers, and suppliers about operational effectiveness
• Action Items: Review status of previous improvement initiatives and prepare recommendations for new actions
• Documentation Format: Use our platform's templates to ensure all required elements meet Hong Kong's corporate governance standards

• Review Scope: Clear definition of which business aspects and time periods the review covers
• Input Requirements: Specified data sources, metrics, and performance indicators to be evaluated
• Roles and Responsibilities: Designated authority levels and accountability for review participants
• Meeting Protocol: Structured agenda, frequency of reviews, and documentation requirements
• Output Format: Standard template for recording decisions, actions, and follow-up assignments
• Compliance Elements: References to relevant Hong Kong regulations and corporate governance standards
• Documentation Storage: Secure record-keeping procedures meeting local data protection requirements

A Management Review Process differs significantly from an Enterprise Risk Management Framework in several key aspects, though both support organizational governance in Hong Kong.

• Scope and Purpose: Management Review focuses on periodic evaluation of system effectiveness and performance, while Enterprise Risk Management provides ongoing structure for identifying and handling organizational risks
• Implementation Timeline: Management Reviews occur at scheduled intervals with specific evaluation points, whereas Risk Management operates continuously throughout the year
• Output Focus: Management Reviews produce specific action items and improvement decisions, while Risk Management creates risk mitigation strategies and control measures
• Stakeholder Involvement: Management Reviews primarily engage senior leadership and department heads, while Risk Management requires input from all organizational levels and specialized risk teams